BW Research
City of Carlsbad Report
< Back   Next >

LAND USE IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD

The majority of residents (53.7%) rated the job the City is doing in balancing the various land uses in the City – including residential, commercial, industrial, and recreational – as “Excellent” (15.5%) or “Good” (38.2%). Twenty-three percent rated the City’s as “Fair” and 20.6 percent gave the City a “Poor” (13.0%) or “Very poor” (7.6%) rating.

Figure 27 - Rating for City’s Job Balancing Land Use
Figure 27 - Rating for City’s Job Balancing Land Use
  • Residents who reported dissatisfaction with the job the City is doing to provide services, those who viewed the quality of life as “Getting worse,” residents that were not confident in city government to make decisions that positively affect the lives of residents, those that felt less than “Very safe” walking alone in their neighborhood (during the day or night), those that provided a negative rating for the job the City does to provide important information, as well as those with a low sense of community were more likely to report negative ratings than their sub-group counterparts.
  • Residents in the 45 to 54 year age group provided the highest “Poor” or “Very poor” ratings (26.3%), followed by residents in the 35 to 44 year age group (23.2%). Comparatively, residents in the 65 year and older (11.5%) and 18 to 24 year (15.3%) age groups were the least likely to provide negative ratings.
  • Residents who have lived in the City between 10 and 14 years were the most likely to provide a negative rating (27.7%), whereas residents who have lived in the City less than five years were the least likely (17.4%).
  • Residents in the 92008 and 92010 zip codes were the most likely to provide ratings of “Excellent” or “Good,” whereas residents in 92009 were the most likely to provide negative ratings.


< Back Top Next >